<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSJ view of Second Act served-up like cold mashed potatoes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.careeracceleration.net/personal-marketing-branding/wsj-view-of-second-act-served-up-like-cold-mashed-potatoes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.careeracceleration.net/personal-marketing-branding/wsj-view-of-second-act-served-up-like-cold-mashed-potatoes/</link>
	<description>Career Counseling and Resume Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 02:07:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.careeracceleration.net/personal-marketing-branding/wsj-view-of-second-act-served-up-like-cold-mashed-potatoes/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://careeracceleration.info/http:/careeracceleration.info/uncategorized/wsj-view-of-second-act-served-up-like-cold-mashed-potatoes/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Maybe the WSJ&#039;s coverage of &quot;second acts&quot; is colored by the fact that the vast majority of their subscribers are rich, Wall Street types.  Play to the audience, I suppose.
Not that I disagree with you here, especially about the non-profit stuff.  There was a great article recently in the Stanford Social Innovation Review (MBAs Gone Wild) which debunks the myth that MBAs can jump into a non-profit and make everything better right away.  Worth reading in this context.
http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/mbas_gone_wild/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the WSJ&#8217;s coverage of &#8220;second acts&#8221; is colored by the fact that the vast majority of their subscribers are rich, Wall Street types.  Play to the audience, I suppose.<br />
Not that I disagree with you here, especially about the non-profit stuff.  There was a great article recently in the Stanford Social Innovation Review (MBAs Gone Wild) which debunks the myth that MBAs can jump into a non-profit and make everything better right away.  Worth reading in this context.<br />
<a href="http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/mbas_gone_wild/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/mbas_gone_wild/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

