As a career professional and a political aficionado, I've been carrying this post around in my head for quite awhile; time to put these thoughts out-there for your consideration… I'm intrigued by the lessons we can learn from this election – the "national interview" that the voters and media are conducting with John McCain and Barack Obama.
If related experience and traditional credentials could win the job, John McCain should be in a better position two weeks prior to Election Day. Instead it is Obama, with training as a lawyer, and limited and varied experience as a community organizer, teacher, and legislator who is most likely to be offered the job. How has that
happened? Why has
someone who lacks compelling experience in the 3 major areas of traditional work
(business/industry, military, government) been able to win the confidence of millions of potential voters? Why has experience not
sealed the deal?
I think the answer lies outside the box – in the transferable skills and personal qualities that are the elephant in the interview.
- Too many candidates conduct their job search campaigns in the McCain model: they respond to the explicit requirements of the job, e.g. 25 years in Senate; military service; and a conservative centrist philosophy in-keeping with that of most Americans. As if faced with a case study or behavioral question, McCain's suspension of his campaign appears to have weakened his presentation in the opinion of the interviewers. He acted unilaterally, and was unable to gain the support of colleagues during the discussion of the $700 billion bailout plan. While McCain has the credentials and experience most sought-after, he did not demonstrate the requisite transferable skills and personal qualities to handle this economic crisis.
- Obama's success in the polls suggests that candidates may be more successful by intuiting the personal qualities needed to meet the job requirements. Obama's presentation reflects his analysis of what the interviewers are looking for – beyond the requirements. Obama has presented himself as calm and thoughtful in response to the $700 billion bail-out plan; he has left himself some wiggle-room in the event he actually inherits is crisis. He appeals to an unstated desire to lower the heat on our discourse and become more unified and accepting in our interpersonal (and global) relations. While Obama's political philosophy may be somewhat to the left of most Americans, he is winning voters over with transferable skills that demonstrate an ability to listen and collaborate before responding to challenges.
Let's relate this thesis to the situation faced by a recent business school graduate. Here's a posted job requirement: 3-5 years brand management experience in a consumer products environment. Suppose you are a candidate with 2-3 years experience as a blogger for a professional association? What are the transferable skills that you gained as a result of this paid or unpaid experience? What are the personal qualities that you can claim as a result of your successful contribution to the exponential growth of the association-its growth in membership, recognition in its space, increased revenue, etc?
- A blogger must design communication that specifically supports a brand, in this case, the niche carved-out by a professional association.
- Your experience required a great deal of collaboration between staff, current members, and the public, including potential members. You've come to understand the perspective of these disparate groups and understand what they need from the association, the brand called…
- You have an impressive portfolio of Web 2.0 and traditional marketing pieces that have been targeted to a niche market. You have conducted competitive analysis in the association's space. Again, this directly transferable to brand management.
- You cultivated relationships with association members who work for consumer products companies; they know you, respect you, and will advocate for you.
So, do you get the interview? If so, can you win the job? Invoke the lessons of the national interview. For more on this topic, listen to Blogtalkradio.com on October 30, 2008 – Noon – <http://www.blogtalkradio.



{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Karen,
Great insight regarding the campaigns and the candidates.
One thing I noticed about the way Obama and McCain “interviewed” – McCain’s politics were personal and Obama’s were not. The ability to remain professional in all situations was a great asset to Obama’s campaign.
Laura